NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+1264%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
