NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1395MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+181%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK110B
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
