AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and a Game console GPU: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 Go GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (28W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z2 Go GPU
+734%
4.147 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireStream
Generation
Console GPU
Desktop
Type
Game console
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
-
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.147 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
28W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
-
GPU Variant
100-000001672
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
13.1 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
