NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+18%
12.63 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
256
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
