NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+467%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1536
280
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Tahiti
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
