Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K2

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +544%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID K2
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy