Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
6848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +588%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
8192
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy