Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
7840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +1942%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

11
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
352
Shading Units
8192
44
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

152W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy