Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1%
14.93 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
8192
288
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy