CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+285%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro P2200
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
160bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
10
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
2
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
4
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20m vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy