Home Comparison Quadro 3000M vs Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

Quadro 3000M vs Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Jetson Orin NX 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Jetson Orin NX 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Jetson Orin NX 16 GB +335%
1880

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

625 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
8
240
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.69 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.38 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.760 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.880 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
940.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GA10B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TE980M-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
332 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net