Quadro 3000M vs RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
10512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
RTX A6000
+8860%
38710
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
84
240
Shading Units
10752
40
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GA102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
