Quadro 3000M vs Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro K2000M
+32%
572
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GK107
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
