3D Rage IIC PCI vs FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2010
Rage 2
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
Shading Units
1600
1
TMUs
80
1
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
Cypress
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
5.0
