NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1612MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+177%
8.253 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
RTX A2000 Embedded
+766%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
RTX A2000 Embedded
+401%
271
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
20
1152
Shading Units
2560
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
