Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K420

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile +785%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K420
0.336 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile +879%
2096
Quadro K420
214

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
41W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net