NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1291MHz vs 1200MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+168%
7.987 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
RTX A2000
+183%
5936
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
1723
RTX A2000
+57%
2712
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
26
1152
Shading Units
3328
72
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
