NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+275%
2.974 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
