NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 68W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+3097%
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
68W
TDP
38W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
C79
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
