NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 120W)
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
+78%
2.573 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2200
127
Quadro M4000
+113%
271
OctaneBench
Quadro K2200
34
Quadro M4000
+64%
56
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1664
40
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
