Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock1550MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+347%
10.65 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2020
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
