Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+18%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
4096
Shading Units
4480
256
TMUs
280
256
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A
