Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Boost Clock2000MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+246%
10.65 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
