Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1770MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
A2
+90%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
