ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 73W)
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
+350%
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
RV630
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
