ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+9500%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
