ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
+2300%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Turks
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
