ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT
+950%
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
112
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
G92B
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G92-280-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
