ATI FireGL V3600 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
+1553%
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireGL
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
DG1
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
Unknown
153 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
