ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+594%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV770
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
