Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3534%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
108W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
