Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +4669%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy