Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +70138%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
23W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy