Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +303%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy