NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 515
We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 515 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (1785MHz vs 800MHz)
832 additional rendering cores
Intel HD Graphics 515 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1090%
3.656 TFLOPS
HD Graphics 515
0.307 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1455%
3220
HD Graphics 515
207
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1355%
1426
HD Graphics 515
98
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
614.4 GFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
307.2 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Skylake GT2
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 9.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm+
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
