NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+28023%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
