NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+8209%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
