NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1386%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
