NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1785MHz vs 1537MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile
+72%
6.296 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+6%
3220
RTX A500 Mobile
3023
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
RTX A500 Mobile
+12%
1604
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
832 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.18 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
