Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1425MHz vs 1400MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+96%
2.15 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2021
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Quadro
Integrated
Type
Desktop
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
