ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
208 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 620 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
Lower TDP (15W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
+35%
0.52 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 620
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2018
FirePro
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
System Shared
DDR3
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
192
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
768.0 GFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
Whiskey Lake GT2
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
Unknown
104 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
