Home Comparison RTX A1000 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

RTX A1000 vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (2250MHz vs 1462MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
6737
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +241%
23040

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

18
SM Count
40
2304
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
72
Tensor Cores
160
18
RT Cores
40
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
AD104
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net