Quadro P2000 vs Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1550MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+1366%
44440
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
14336
64
TMUs
896
40
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
