Quadro P2000 vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+127%
3031
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF110
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
