Home Comparison Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1500MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
Radeon Instinct MI25 +305%
12290

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
160bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Vega 10
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net