Quadro 2000 vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Tesla K20c
+634%
3524
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GK110
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
