Quadro 2000 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 62W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+516%
2957
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
TU117B
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
