Quadro 2000 vs GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
GRID M60 4A
+905%
4825
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GM204
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
