CMP 170HX vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+1163%
12630
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
800
280
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV770
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1