CMP 170HX vs FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+1044%
12630
FirePro V5800
1104
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
800
280
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
74W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Juniper
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0